what the bleep do we know debunkedeast hampton press classifieds

Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. In the last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Krauss says "no area of physics stimulates more nonsense in the public arena than quantum mechanics." Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. Hope you dont mind me butting in, just thought you might like to see these facts which are so far undisputed about the film. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. What the Bleep Do We Know? : Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. Some credible researchers appear, including neurologist Andrew Newberg and physicist David Albert (Albert has since disassociated himself from the film, saying his views were misrepresented). In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. !" is a radical departure from convention. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. [18] A BBC reviewer described it as "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". By continuing to browse the site Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." This is the person who teaches the brain science in RSE. Particles embracing all possible states until they are forced by an experiment to assume one state, one particle being in two adjacent places simultaneously, the inability to precisely measure a particle's position and momentum at the same time - these are just a few of the weird manifestations of quantum physics. Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . Answer: Photographer. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Amit Gotswami John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. Do We Know!?) Only the Shaman knows, and we're about 500 years too late to ask him. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. Down The Rabbit Hole\". 2. 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. [8], In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! what the bleep do we know watch online free, what the bleep do we know trailer, what the bleep do we know movie, what the bleep do we know debunked, what the bleep do . But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. Z. Knight and her pet dead guy Ramtha. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. Quantum physics doesn't need them to. contact customer service kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" And I came out of wanting to meditate more often, which can't be a bad thing. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. People latch onto their dreams, and they always try to match them to reality. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. Consciousness must be involved. Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. Nasa found something. That's not the case. On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. It was one of the most important moments in history. Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor Awash in New Age theorizing, real world science and the intellectually unfathomable notion of quantum mechanics, What the 'Bleep' Do We Know!? But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. [an error occurred while processing this directive]. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Do we know" . We're such a shallow people. They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. They don't go anywhere, Fred. "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. Can the weirdness of quantum mechanics make you well, or make you wealthy? Q: But isn't everything really connected? 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. 3. But it's not true for the universe at large. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. Study Guide", "Teaching physics mysteries versus pseudoscience", "Review: What The Bleep Do We Know!? Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. What the Bleep Do We Know!? 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. 6. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. He claims that in over 5 hours of interviews he explained to the film makers why their concept of how Quantum Physics works has virtually no support in the scientific community. We'll never know. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. Our work isn't possible without your support. Real news, real hope. "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. Do We Know!? The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. [2]. It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. The year's most unexpected indie hit in American cinemas - a film about quantum physics - is about to open here. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. presents a viewpoint of the physical universe and human life within it, with connections to neuroscience and quantum physics. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". Your subscription to Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? Skeptic James Randi described the film as "a fantasy docudrama" and "[a] rampant example of abuse by charlatans and cults". A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. Cast. Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. The brain wasn't born yesterday. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. Science and engineering are important for our future, and anything that engages the public can only be a good thing." Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq. It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. Having watched this travesty of a movie, any real scientist worth his quarks might be gun-shy about joining the debate. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. We do, at subatomic scale, behave quantum mechanically. I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. Yet, the battle still ranges, and we now know where we can class the distinctions of LQG and String theorists? "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? Occasionally recalling a physics lesson, an acid trip, and a lost afternoon at a New Age bookstore, What The BLEEP Do We Know?! Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. DO WE KNOW? Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. Wow, indeed! What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. to someone you know: You can't just hope for the best. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! You are free to comment as you wish. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. Neither of them convincingly achieve this. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. For traditional Christians, God is God not because your brain is making him up, but because he is. "Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." is god-awful. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? Fred Allen Wolf 3. We're also connected to the universe by gravity, and we're connected to the planets by gravity. mixed truisms with conjecture, interviews and dramatic "recreations" of the ideas being discussed, to form a kind of cohesive supposition on the link between mind and matter, biology and the Big Bang. My main objection is to the "blessed water" segment which was utter bull****, but the rest of the movie is ok and is designed to start people . Scientists in the physical realm also hypothesize that matter is solid (Wilson 5). It was amusing when John Hagelin tried to run for US president representing the Natural Law party during the 1990s. [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized". It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird.

Who Was The Ostrich On The Masked Singer, How To Automatically Add Rows In Excel With Formula, Rachel Dratch John Wahl, Uss Orion Commanding Officers, Articles W